Pembiayaan dan
Asuransi Risiko Bencana (PARB)

Protecting the State Budget, Accelerating Recovery

Understanding Indonesia's Disaster Risk Financing Strategy

The Disaster Risk Financing and Insurance (DRFI) Strategy is a combination of financial instruments to obtain an adequate, timely, effective, sustainable, and transparent disaster risk funding scheme.

Brief History: This strategy was developed by the Fiscal Policy Agency (BKF) and officially launched by the Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia in October 2018 in Bali during the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings. The PARB was created as a solution to Indonesia’s challenges as the 12th-highest disaster-risk country in the world.

Analysis of Indonesia's High Risk of Natural Disasters

Indonesia faces extreme geological and hydrometeorological hazards due to its geographic location. This high ranking reflects the vulnerability of a large population living in earthquake-, tsunami-, and flood-prone areas across the country.

Main Problems:

Complete reliance on the state budget creates a funding gap when a major disaster occurs, potentially disrupting economic stability and slowing recovery.

VULNERABLE CONDITIONS

Before PARB Strategy

100% of disaster risks directly burden the budget.

TOUGH CONDITION

After PARB Strategy

Layered shields protect the budget from volatility.

High Impact
Low
APBN
APBD
Micro Insurance
Donor / Grant
Disaster Pooling Fund (PFB)
Parametric Insurance
Asset Insurance (BMN/D)
RESIDUAL RISK

Unfunded liabilities.

RESIDUAL RISK
Low Frequency
Tall

Analisis Risiko Tinggi Bencana Alam Indonesia

Indonesia menghadapi ancaman geologis dan hidrometeorologi ekstrem karena lokasi geografisnya. Peringkat tinggi ini mencerminkan kerentanan populasi besar yang tinggal di wilayah rawan gempa, tsunami, serta banjir di seluruh pelosok negeri.

Masalah Utama:

Ketergantungan penuh pada APBN menciptakan celah pendanaan (funding gap) saat terjadi bencana besar, yang berpotensi mengganggu stabilitas ekonomi dan memperlambat pemulihan.

Analysis of Indonesia's High Risk of Natural Disasters

Situated at the intersection of tectonic plates and volcanic belts, Indonesia faces significant geological and hydrometeorological risks. This geographic location places millions of residents at constant risk from earthquakes, tsunamis, and flash floods. The high national risk rating is not simply a number; it reflects the vulnerability of populations spread across disaster-prone areas. Collective preparedness is needed to mitigate impacts across the country, protecting public safety and future environmental stability.

Main Problems:

Complete reliance on the state budget creates a funding gap when a major disaster occurs, potentially disrupting economic stability and slowing recovery.

Catatan Kesenjangan Fiskal

Tahun 2006 (Gempa DIY)

Realisasi anggaran melonjak seratus persen dari plafon awal akibat gempa besar Yogyakarta yang menuntut percepatan pendanaan darurat.

Tahun 2018 (Lombok, Palu)

Rentetan bencana katastropik memicu lonjakan realisasi hingga empat belas triliun rupiah yang menegaskan perlunya reformasi strategi.

Volatility History: Allocation vs. Realization

Tahun 2004 (Tsunami Aceh)

Allocation: Rp3 T
Alokasi: Rp3 T 6%
Realization: Rp51 T
Realisasi: Rp376,51 T 100%

2006 (DIY Earthquake)

Allocation: Rp3 T
Alokasi: Rp3 T 30%
Realization: Rp6 T
Realisasi: Rp6 T 60%

2018 (Lombok, Palu Earthquake)

Allocation: Rp4 T
Alokasi: Rp4 T 26%
Realization: Rp14 T
Realisasi: Rp14 T 90%

A major disaster exceeds planned reserve funds.

2004 (Aceh Tsunami)

The massive tsunami disaster forced budget realization to be fully absorbed from the initial ceiling for emergency funding and energy subsidies.

2006 (DIY Earthquake)

Budget realization jumped one hundred percent from the initial ceiling due to the major Yogyakarta earthquake which required accelerated emergency funding.

2018 (Lombok, Palu Earthquake)

A series of catastrophic disasters triggered a surge in realization of up to fourteen trillion rupiah, which emphasized the need for strategic reform.

Masalah Utama:

Ketergantungan penuh pada APBN menciptakan celah pendanaan (funding gap) saat terjadi bencana besar, yang berpotensi mengganggu stabilitas ekonomi dan memperlambat pemulihan.

Risk Layering Strategy

The government no longer bears all risks alone. We use a tiered approach:
retaining small risks (retention) and transferring large risks (transfer) to insurance.

Risk Layering Principle

This strategy combines various financing schemes for maximum efficiency. Based on historical data, the government has limited budget to cover all economic losses from major disasters.

Two Main Factors of Classification:

Frequency Factor

Disaster categories Rare vs Frequent.

Impact Factor

Large vs. Small economic/physical losses.

Retain (Government Responsibility)

Optimal for frequent disasters/small losses (low-scale earthquakes). Source: APBN/APBD, Pooling Fund, & Contingency Loans.

Transfer (Insurance)

Mandatory for major disasters (Tsunami/Large Earthquake) to facilitate access to funds from external sources.

Risk Transfer

BMN Insurance, Reinsurance, Capital Market

Focus: State Balance Protection

Risk Pooling

Standby Loan, PFB

Focus: Liquidity Flexibility

Risk Retention

APBN (Reserve Fund), APBD

Focus: Operational Efficiency

Fiscal Resilience Approach

Strategi Risk Layering changing the paradigm of disaster management from reactive to proactive to maintain the continuity of the APBN.

1. Catastrophic Shock

Transferring risk to global markets to prevent sudden debt spikes due to major disasters.

2. Intermediate Needs

Providing fast access to funds through the Disaster Pooling Fund without lengthy budget bureaucracy.

3. Routine Risk

Small-scale disasters are handled directly by the APBN/APBD so that core development continues.

↑ Low
Frequency
↓ High

Before DRFI Strategy

All disaster risks directly burden the state budget (APBN/D)

Transfer
Retention
Residual Risk
Donor
Micro Insurance
Local Budget
State Budget

DRFI Strategy

Risk is partially transferred to the global insurance market

Transfer
Retention
Residual Risk
Donor
Micro Insurance
Parametric Insurance
State/Local Assets Insurance
Disaster Pooling Fund
(PFB)
Contingent Credit
Local Budget
State Budget

Fiscal Resilience Approach

Risk Layering strategy ensures sustainable development

CATASTROPHIC SHOCKS

Transferring risk to the insurance market to prevent sudden debt spikes caused by large-scale disasters.

ROUTINE RISKS

Small-scale disasters are retained and managed directly through regular state and local budget expenditure instruments.

↑ High
Severity
↓ Low

Frequency

Impact

Financing Instruments

Seldom

Big

BMN Insurance, Parametric Insurance, International Reinsurance.

Currently

Currently

Joint Fund (PFB) and Contingent Loans.

Often

Small

APBN (Reserve Fund) and Regional APBD.

Fiscal Gap Facing Disaster Risk

Major disasters exceed reserve funds so
requires a comprehensive risk funding strategy.

Fiscal Evaluation of the 2006 DIY Earthquake

Realisasi anggaran melonjak seratus persen dari plafon awal akibat gempa besar Yogyakarta yang menuntut percepatan pendanaan darurat serta pemulihan infrastruktur.

2009 Padang Earthquake Budget Pressure

The massive absorption of reserve fund allocations to support the recovery of the West Sumatra region demonstrates the urgency of quickly providing fiscal liquidity.

Escalation of Reconstruction Needs 2018-2019

A series of catastrophic disasters triggered a surge in realization of up to fourteen trillion rupiah, which emphasized the need for reform of the national disaster risk funding strategy.

PARB Challenges and Strategies

Complete reliance on the state budget creates a funding gap during major disasters,
which has the potential to disrupt economic stability and slow recovery.

Before PARB Strategy

All risks are borne by the APBN/D

Donor

Micro Insurance

A P B D

A P B N

PARB Strategy

Some of the risk is transferred to the insurance market

Donor

Micro Insurance

Parametric Insurance

Insurance (BMN/D)

Pooling Fund Bencana (PFB)

Standby Loan

A P B D

A P B N

Click on the shield layer to see how the PARB instrument drastically reduces the residual risk burden of the APBN.

Comparison of Main Instruments

Pooling Fund Bencana

Understanding Indonesia's Disaster Risk Financing Strategy

The Disaster Pooling Fund (PFB) is the primary instrument of the PARB Strategy. The PFB is a scheme for collecting, accumulating, and disbursing funds specifically for disasters by a fund management institution. The PFB’s establishment aims to protect the state budget from disaster-related pressures through proactive efforts during non-disaster periods, through investments in accumulated funds and risk transfer through insurance.

PFB BUSINESS MODEL, Resilient APBN and sufficient Buffer available

To accelerate the protection of BMN/BMD and strengthen fiscal resilience against disasters

BMN Insurance (Indemnity)

The first risk transfer instrument launched since the 2019 pilot at the Ministry of Finance. Focusing on Compensation Insurance, where claims are paid according to the actual value of damage through a Loss Adjuster assessment.

Public Asset Coverage (Valuable):

Total Insured State Assets (2025)

Rp 91T

Ministry/Agency Budget (APBN)

Rp 61 T

PFB Development

Rp 30 T

Piloting PFB 2025 (Strategic Assets):

Parametric Insurance

Designed for the rapid reconstruction of vital infrastructure (bridges, hospitals, schools) during emergency response. Claim payments occur immediately after triggering parameters are met.

Trigger Mechanism: “Claims are paid out within days if the parameters (Example: Earthquake MMI Scale) are met. However, there is no claim if the parameters are not met even if there is physical damage.

Status: Regulations are being drafted “Other Risk Transfer Mechanisms” to differentiate it from conventional schemes.

Stage I: Earthquake Risk

Chosen because the earthquake parameters are the clearest and most accurately measured by independent international/national institutions.

Data Verification:

Data accuracy from National / International Independent Institutions.

ABPN and APBD

Disaster risks for high-frequency events with relatively low impacts are mitigated through budget allocations in the national and regional budgets. These budget allocations are realized in the form of disaster management programs by each agency/regional government.

Comparison of Main Instruments

PARB does not work alone. Policy implementation is strengthened through synergy
with specialist institutions to ensure environmental sustainability and disaster resilience.

State Property Insurance (Indemnity)

A physical asset protection scheme for state-owned property. Operates on the indemnity principle, providing compensation based on the actual valuation of damage.

Target Assets:

Statistics 2025

Rp 91 trillion

Total Value of Insured Assets

Includes: MoF (Kemenkeu), State Secretariat (Kemensetneg), Health (Kemenkes), and Religious Affairs (Kemenag).

Parametric Insurance (Quick Response)

Parameter-based (index) protection scheme. Claims are automatically paid out when disaster parameters are reached (e.g., a 7.0 SR earthquake), without waiting for a damage survey.

Key Advantage: Speed. Funds are disbursed within days for emergency response.

Trigger Parameters:

Time Comparison

Regular Insurance
3-6 Months 80%
Parametric
~14 Days 50%

Understanding Indonesia's Disaster Risk Financing Strategy

The Disaster Pooling Fund (PFB) is the primary instrument of the PARB Strategy. The PFB is a scheme for collecting, accumulating, and disbursing funds specifically for disasters by a fund management institution. The PFB’s establishment aims to protect the state budget from disaster-related pressures through proactive efforts during non-disaster periods, through investments in accumulated funds and risk transfer through insurance.

PFB BUSINESS MODEL, Resilient APBN and sufficient Buffer available

To accelerate the protection of BMN/BMD and strengthen fiscal resilience against disasters

BMN Insurance (Indemnity)

The first risk transfer instrument launched since the 2019 pilot at the Ministry of Finance. Focusing on Compensation Insurance, where claims are paid according to the actual value of damage through a Loss Adjuster assessment.

Public Asset Coverage (Valuable):

Total Insured State Assets (2025)

Rp 91T

Ministry/Agency Budget (APBN)

Rp 61 T

PFB Development

Rp 30 T

Piloting PFB 2025 (Strategic Assets):

Parametric Insurance

Designed for the rapid reconstruction of vital infrastructure (bridges, hospitals, schools) during emergency response. Claim payments occur immediately after triggering parameters are met.

Trigger Mechanism: “Claims are paid out within days if the parameters (Example: Earthquake MMI Scale) are met. However, there is no claim if the parameters are not met even if there is physical damage.

Status: Regulations are being drafted “Other Risk Transfer Mechanisms” to differentiate it from conventional schemes.

Stage I: Earthquake Risk

Chosen because the earthquake parameters are the clearest and most accurately measured by independent international/national institutions.

Data Verification:

Data accuracy from National / International Independent Institutions.

Pooling Fund Bencana

Menyediakan likuiditas cepat melalui dana bersama.